With the riots dying out on the streets of England the public debate on their background and causes, is getting increasingly more vocal.
All kind of questions are being asked and many points of view are being shared.
Another argues that there are deep and uncovered
social causes behind it.
The fourth speaks about mob culture, broken families, consumerism and a false sense of entitlement and so on.
Whichever side of the argument you take - the sheer scale and the character of the riots aggravated by lootings, rampage and arson can't take away the seriousness of what had happened over the last week.
By coincidence, during all of those days, I was re-reading and reviewing classic Russian and English literature.
So what I would like to discuss here is the mindset of those, who overstepped the boundaries of normality. Could the likes of Dostoevsky and Dickens help us to better understand it?
Who are these people?
The finger of blame is pointing mainly at the street gangs.
For quite a while these gangs of 'yobsters' have been marking and controlling their post code 'ends' and if you are a stranger on their territory, you could end up being beaten up, mugged or stabbed.
Any teenager in London is aware and lives with this reality.
We adults, maybe not knowingly, but regularly hear about it in the event of 'knife crimes' taking place, when absolutely ordinary boys and girls are stabbed without any obvious reasons.
So, as the authorities indicate, these gangs were the main actors and beneficiaries of the rampage.
But it becomes apparent that among the looters there were also wider representatives of youth and society as a whole.
"Everyone was just on a riot, going mad, chucking things, chucking bottles - it was good, though."
Her friend added: "Breaking into shops - it was madness, it was good fun." One of the girls continued: "It's the government's fault. I don't know. Conservatives, whoever it is. It's the rich people who've got businesses and that's why all this happened."
Pictures released by police and seen on TV screens show kids as young as 10-12 years old, unmasked girls casually walking, young men and women carrying out boxes with plasma screens, all sorts of gadgets and bags full of clothing.
In short - lots of 'opportunists'.
Messages whizzing around on the social networks in teenage groups indicated that it's simply opportunism, and 'because everyone's doing it, it's safe to do it without any fear of repercussions'.
So for many youngsters outside the gangs, it was just a free for all mob mentality that pulled them in. "That's what's it all about - showing the police that we could do whatever we want; show the rich people that we could do whatever we want" - as the above mentioned girl said